CNN is running a fascinating opinion series by William Bennett on the Affordable Care Act and the Supreme Court ruling.
Some highlights from today's piece-
The Supreme Court's verdict on Obamacare is in. As a tax, the individual mandate stands; as a Commerce Clause regulation, it fails.
Some highlights from today's piece-
The Supreme Court's verdict on Obamacare is in. As a tax, the individual mandate stands; as a Commerce Clause regulation, it fails.
What remains to be seen
is whether Chief Justice John Roberts has crafted a masterly
constitutional balancing act -- limiting federal authority and
respecting the separations of powers -- or if he has engaged in a
disappointing and inappropriate usurpation of the legislative function.
There are arguments on
both sides. Some say that Roberts, not wanting to uphold the liberal
reasoning behind Obamacare and an unprecedented expansion of federal
power, concocted an opinion that would be limiting in scope, while still
respecting the law and seeming nonpartisan. Others say that Roberts has
unlawfully manipulated the mandate into a tax, thereby giving legs to a
law that has none...
Chief Roberts writes in the majority opinion, "The
mandate can be regarded as establishing a condition -- not owning health
insurance -- that triggers a tax -- the required payment to IRS."
The dissenters, Justices
Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito,
adamantly disagree: "[T]o say that the Individual Mandate merely imposes
a tax is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it..."
The dissent is right.
Roberts recast the mandate as a tax, a rationale that was not in the law
or the government's case. He rewrote the administration's position,
baptized it, and then blessed it. Roberts' defenders argue that he did
so to avoid a constitutional crisis, but he may have created another by
judicially re-legislating policy, a policy paid for and enforced by what
could be essentially the largest tax increase in American history.
Roberts could have
characterized the mandate as a tax and sent it back to the Congress,
whose role is to legislate taxation, to redo.
Furthermore, the Roberts
opinion invalidated Obamacare's penalty on states that refuse the
massive expansion of Medicaid subscribers. States can opt out of the
expansion of Medicaid and not be subject to a loss of funding. This is
no doubt a victory for federalism and the 26 states that filed lawsuits
against the government.
The
verdict, while a serious judicial blow to conservatives, may favor them
politically. Mitt Romney and Republican leaders can now campaign
relentlessly against a massive, sweeping tax increase that will fall on
the shoulders of an already weak economy.
The Supreme Court
did not hand conservatives a lifeline. Elections have consequences and
this fall's will be monumental.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are always welcome here!